Home| FAQ Search:Advanced|Person|Company| Type|Class Login
Quick search:
Patent number:
Patent Date:
first    back  next  last
US Patent: 4,630,214
Jig Grinder With Automatic Reciprocation and Outfeed Control
Patentees:
Kevin S. Barney (exact or similar names) - Monroe, Fairfield County, CT
Theodore J. Langevin (exact or similar names) - Seymour, New Haven County, CT
Harold W. Lawson, Jr. (exact or similar names) - Shelton, Fairfield County, CT
Dennis A. Winski (exact or similar names) - Fairfield, Fairfield County, CT

USPTO Classifications:
318/39, 451/26, 700/164

Tool Categories:
metalworking machines : grinders : jig grinders

Assignees:
Moore Special Tool Co., Inc. - Bridgeport, Fairfield County, CT

Manufacturer:
Not known to have been produced

Witnesses:
Unknown

Patent Dates:
Applied: Apr. 13, 1984
Granted: Dec. 16, 1986

Patent Pictures:
USPTO (New site tip)
Google Patents
Report data errors or omissions to steward Joel Havens
"Vintage Machinery" entry for Moore Special Tool Co., Inc.
Description:
Abstract:

A control system for an automated jig grinder enables an operator to designate an incremental outfeed distance to be traversed for each outfeed operation and a reciprocation stroke count to be completed between successive outfeeds. The control system counts grinding tool reciprocation strokes and actuates an outfeed mechanism to outfeed the grinding tool the designated outfeed distance when the designated reciprocation stroke count has been reached. The incremental outfeed distance and reciprocation stroke count settings can be modified by the machine operator on a real time basis as the machine is running. The control system also enables the grinding tool to automatically travel from its upper position toward a workpiece at a first relatively high rate of speed, and then change to a slower rate of speed as the tool approaches the workpiece. This aspect of the invention is useful in wipe grinding. Alternatively, the control system allows the grinding tool to automatically travel from its upper position toward a workpiece at an initial slow rate of speed, and then change to a higher rate of speed for reciprocation. In this manner, excessive overshoot past the reciprocation limits established by an operator can be prevented.

Copyright © 2002-2024 - DATAMP